I run your testing and funnel program personally. Offers, angles, pages, and the tests that decide between them. Three brands at a time.
Three brands at a time. Never more.
Your buyers do not all want the same thing. So each persona gets its own angle, and each angle gets three real pages, not a headline swap. Then we find out.
I mine your reviews and tickets for the real reasons people buy. Each reason becomes a persona.
Every persona gets three genuinely different pages. Different promise, different proof, different structure.
They run against your control, sized so the answer is real rather than a hunch.
Sometimes one page lands. Sometimes a whole persona is a goldmine and all three beat control.
Nine real pages used to be a quarter of work and most of a budget. Building them is now the cheap part. Which means you get to find out instead of guess.
One page in your funnel. Your revenue through it, your margin, one winning test.
Whatever number lands on the right is what a single winner is worth to you, every month it keeps running. You already know whether that is interesting.
Not theory. These are the reps behind every hypothesis I will put in front of your traffic.
That much has run through funnels I tested and rebuilt. I have seen what wins across categories, price points and margins, which is why my first guess is rarely my worst one.
Every dollar clients paid me at cnvrt.co came back eighty times over across the programs I ran that year. Measured against agreed baselines, not estimated after the fact.
I ran the landing page agency. I wrote the copy, designed the structures, and charged five thousand a page because that is what it took. I know this work from the inside.
Warm traffic forgives a weak offer. Your list already trusts you, so it converts almost anything. Cold traffic does not, which makes it the only honest test of whether something can scale.
I spend my days there. At nativeadagency.co we buy native traffic for e-commerce brands and get paid on performance, which means an offer that does not work cold does not get paid.
That is the lens I bring to your funnel: not just a page that converts your existing audience better, but an offer strangers say yes to at volume.
Cold buyers have no reason to trust you. The claim has to be specific enough to be checkable and modest enough to be credible.
An offer that only works at a 2 ROAS is not an offer, it is a hobby. I build the economics backwards from what you can afford to pay for a customer.
Bundles, guarantees, and structures that answer "why now" without a countdown timer insulting anybody's intelligence.
If it wins cold, it wins warm, and it keeps winning as you pour more spend into it. That order never runs backwards.
I ran the landing page agency. I wrote the copy. I designed the structures. I know exactly what makes a page convert, because I spent years finding out the expensive way.
Now I tell AI to do precisely what I would have done by hand. Same conversion performance. Often better, because I can afford to build five and let your traffic pick.
The work that used to be $5,000 and a week is now a fraction of both. I did not get cheaper. The production got cheaper, and I passed it on.
Same rigor. Same research discipline. Same statistical bar. Twenty-five times the volume of work getting through the door.
And no, it will not look like AI slop. Anyone can prompt a page. Knowing how to direct these tools so the result is indistinguishable from anything else on your store is the entire skill. That is the difference between me and someone who just discovered them.
A page was a week and five thousand dollars, so everybody built one, defended it, and called that a strategy. You could not afford to miss.
The arrows got cheap. Fire twenty and the ones that miss cost you almost nothing, while the ones that land keep paying every month they run.
That is the whole shift, and most stores have not caught up to it yet.
The tenth thousand you push into a funnel never performs like the first. The good inventory is already yours, so you start buying worse traffic at the margin and the blended number quietly sags.
Most brands accept that, because they only have one funnel worth spending on. When you have four, you never have to push any of them past the point where they stop working.
Nothing is being force-fed traffic it cannot convert, so your blended cost per acquisition comes down instead of creeping up.
Four funnels returning cleanly beats one funnel returning slowly. The money comes back faster and buys the next day of spend.
One funnel is one fatigue cycle, one account issue, one seasonal dip away from a bad quarter. Four is a portfolio.
Same budget. Spread across things that are provably working instead of concentrated on the one thing you happened to build first. That option only exists once building the alternatives got cheap.
Read from your analytics, not mine. This is the format your board uses from week one.
Cold traffic did not understand the bundle. Hero rewritten around the strongest phrase from 214 reviews.
Guarantee restated beside price. Did not move the number. Killed at half traffic. Cost four days.
Shipping fields before account creation on mobile. Sized to significance before shipping.
Three brands at a time. When the seats fill, this page says so.
Twenty minutes on your real funnel. I will tell you what I would test first and roughly what I think it is worth. If your numbers do not clear the bar, I will say so and we both save the time.
Book the fit call$7,500 a month · three brands at a time