E-commerce brands doing $500k+ a month

It costs $7,500 a month to work with me.
It costs you more not to.

I run your testing and funnel program personally. Offers, angles, pages, and the tests that decide between them. Three brands at a time.

Three brands at a time. Never more.

$1B+
revenue through funnels I tested
1:80
return on testing, 2024
25×
the output I shipped two years ago
What testing does to a yeargross profit / mo
THE APPROACH

Three pages per persona. Your traffic picks.

Your buyers do not all want the same thing. So each persona gets its own angle, and each angle gets three real pages, not a headline swap. Then we find out.

Persona 01 the sceptic v1 v2 WON v3 1 of 3 landed Persona 02 the price shopper v1 WON v2 v3 WON 2 of 3 landed Persona 03 the gift buyer v1 WON v2 WON v3 WON all 3 landed
01 Personas

I mine your reviews and tickets for the real reasons people buy. Each reason becomes a persona.

02 Three pages each

Every persona gets three genuinely different pages. Different promise, different proof, different structure.

03 Real traffic

They run against your control, sized so the answer is real rather than a hunch.

04 Scale the winners

Sometimes one page lands. Sometimes a whole persona is a goldmine and all three beat control.

Nine real pages used to be a quarter of work and most of a budget. Building them is now the cheap part. Which means you get to find out instead of guess.

THE MATH
Do not take my word for any of this. Run it on your own numbers.

One page in your funnel. Your revenue through it, your margin, one winning test.

Whatever number lands on the right is what a single winner is worth to you, every month it keeps running. You already know whether that is interesting.

$500,000
30%
+10%
+$15,000
gross profit a month, while it runs
+$180,000
across a year, from one winner
That is one winning test, on one page. Most funnels have several worth testing.
WHO IS DOING THE WORK

Twelve years of finding out what actually moves a number.

Not theory. These are the reps behind every hypothesis I will put in front of your traffic.

$1B+
Revenue optimized

That much has run through funnels I tested and rebuilt. I have seen what wins across categories, price points and margins, which is why my first guess is rarely my worst one.

1:80
Return on testing, 2024

Every dollar clients paid me at cnvrt.co came back eighty times over across the programs I ran that year. Measured against agreed baselines, not estimated after the fact.

$5k
What one page used to cost

I ran the landing page agency. I wrote the copy, designed the structures, and charged five thousand a page because that is what it took. I know this work from the inside.

WHERE THE SCALE IS
I build offers that hold up on cold traffic.

Warm traffic forgives a weak offer. Your list already trusts you, so it converts almost anything. Cold traffic does not, which makes it the only honest test of whether something can scale.

I spend my days there. At nativeadagency.co we buy native traffic for e-commerce brands and get paid on performance, which means an offer that does not work cold does not get paid.

That is the lens I bring to your funnel: not just a page that converts your existing audience better, but an offer strangers say yes to at volume.

The promise a stranger believes

Cold buyers have no reason to trust you. The claim has to be specific enough to be checkable and modest enough to be credible.

Margin that survives paid

An offer that only works at a 2 ROAS is not an offer, it is a hobby. I build the economics backwards from what you can afford to pay for a customer.

A reason to buy today

Bundles, guarantees, and structures that answer "why now" without a countdown timer insulting anybody's intelligence.

Built to be scaled, not just launched

If it wins cold, it wins warm, and it keeps winning as you pour more spend into it. That order never runs backwards.

WHY $7,500 WORKS
I used to sell one landing page for $5,000.

I ran the landing page agency. I wrote the copy. I designed the structures. I know exactly what makes a page convert, because I spent years finding out the expensive way.

Now I tell AI to do precisely what I would have done by hand. Same conversion performance. Often better, because I can afford to build five and let your traffic pick.

The work that used to be $5,000 and a week is now a fraction of both. I did not get cheaper. The production got cheaper, and I passed it on.

2023 · me
typical agency
2026 · me 25×

Same rigor. Same research discipline. Same statistical bar. Twenty-five times the volume of work getting through the door.

And no, it will not look like AI slop. Anyone can prompt a page. Knowing how to direct these tools so the result is indistinguishable from anything else on your store is the entire skill. That is the difference between me and someone who just discovered them.

INCLUDED WITH EVERY SEAT
You also get the tools. All of them.

I did not just learn AI. I built my own stack on top of it: the system that researches angles, writes pages, and builds funnels the way I would by hand. It is what makes four-plus real pages a month possible at all.

Every client gets full access, free, for as long as we work together. Your team can use it. It does not leave when a project ends, it compounds inside your company.

Nobody else has this stack, because I have not released it. Working with me is currently the only way in.

What the stack did last monthverified internally
$150k MRR
in 30 days, from launch

My co-founder at nativeadagency.co launched his own e-commerce brand and ran it on my tools: the angle research, the ads, the pages.

Thirty days later it was doing $150,000 in monthly recurring revenue.

His brand, his execution, my stack. I will walk you through exactly what it looked like on the call if you want the details.
THE SHIFT

Being wrong used to be expensive. Now not being wrong enough is.

A page was a week and five thousand dollars, so everybody built one, defended it, and called that a strategy. You could not afford to miss.

The arrows got cheap. Fire twenty and the ones that miss cost you almost nothing, while the ones that land keep paying every month they run.

That is the whole shift, and most stores have not caught up to it yet.

Cheap arrows change where your ad budget can go.

The tenth thousand you push into a funnel never performs like the first. The good inventory is already yours, so you start buying worse traffic at the margin and the blended number quietly sags.

Most brands accept that, because they only have one funnel worth spending on. When you have four, you never have to push any of them past the point where they stop working.

efficient ceiling ONE FUNNEL spend that stops paying for itself $20,000 a day pushed past its ceiling FOUR FUNNELS $5,000 a day, four times every one of them still working
Better unit economics

Nothing is being force-fed traffic it cannot convert, so your blended cost per acquisition comes down instead of creeping up.

Better cash flow

Four funnels returning cleanly beats one funnel returning slowly. The money comes back faster and buys the next day of spend.

Better nights of sleep

One funnel is one fatigue cycle, one account issue, one seasonal dip away from a bad quarter. Four is a portfolio.

Same budget. Spread across things that are provably working instead of concentrated on the one thing you happened to build first. That option only exists once building the alternatives got cheap.

YOUR BOARD

Every test logged. Win or lose. In writing.

Read from your analytics, not mine. This is the format your board uses from week one.

WINNER · +11.2% CVR Offer clarity above the fold

Cold traffic did not understand the bundle. Hero rewritten around the strongest phrase from 214 reviews.

Sample 18,420 · Significance 97%
LOSS · FLAT Trust block near price

Guarantee restated beside price. Did not move the number. Killed at half traffic. Cost four days.

Sample 9,860 · Reported as a loss
WINNER · +4.8% checkout Checkout field order

Shipping fields before account creation on mobile. Sized to significance before shipping.

Sample 22,308 · Significance 96%
THE FIT

This works stupidly well for some brands. Badly for others.

Take a seat if

  • You run a DTC e-commerce brand doing $500k to $5M a month
  • You are spending real money on paid traffic, and conversion is the number nobody owns
  • One person can say yes to copy. You, ideally.
  • You want the answer, whatever it is. Wins and losses, in writing.

Pass if

  • You are under $500k a month. Tests crawl and winners are worth too little. Come back bigger.
  • You sell mainly on marketplaces. If you do not own the funnel, I cannot test it.
  • Copy goes through a committee. Approval by committee is the most expensive thing in this work.
  • You want a guarantee instead of a track record. I sell the second one.

If you are reading the left column nodding, the rest of this page is arithmetic.

ONE PRICE

$7,500 a month. Here is everything it buys.

Spelled out, because you should know exactly what you are paying for. No tiers, no upsells, no surprise scope.

$7,500
per month · monthly · cancel any month
  • Persona research from your reviews, tickets and session recordings
  • Angles mapped for every persona worth money
  • Landing pages and funnels built end to end, written and QA'd by me
  • A/B tests run against your control, sized to significance
  • Offers restructured to hold up on cold traffic
  • Your test log, every result in writing, wins and losses
  • My full AI stack, free access for your whole team
  • Me, directly. No account manager between you and the work.
Book the fit call

Three brands at a time. When the seats fill, this page says so.

STRAIGHT ANSWERS

Everything you would ask on a call, answered here.

Is there a guarantee? +
No. A guarantee prices in the clients it fails, which means the good clients subsidise the bad fits. I filter hard instead, and the deal is monthly: I have to earn the next month, every month, or you cancel. That is a sharper guarantee than any refund clause, because it never stops applying.
Why is this $7,500 when agencies charge $20k? +
Because my cost to produce the work collapsed and I passed it on instead of pocketing it. An agency at $20k is paying for a team, an office, and account managers between you and the work. You are paying for the work.
How fast will I see results? +
First pages are live in week two. The first statistically real reads land in weeks three to six, depending on your traffic. Some of those first tests will lose, that is normal and I will report it plainly. The compounding is what you buy: by month three you have a stack of winners running and a map of what your buyers respond to.
Will AI-built pages look like AI slop? +
The opposite. The tools remove production time, which is the boring part. What goes into the page is the research, the customer language, and twelve years of judgement about what moves a number. If you can tell which page on your store I built, I have failed, and you can tell me so.
How do we count what a test made? +
Baseline, metric, and window agreed in writing before anything ships. Read from your analytics, not mine. A losing test gets reported as a losing test. That habit is why my numbers are trusted.
Why not just hire someone in-house? +
A good in-house growth hire is $120k+ a year, three months to find, three more to ramp, and they still need the tools and the reps. I arrive with both, cost less, and if it is not working you are out one month, not a severance conversation. When you do eventually hire in-house, they inherit my test log and start from a map.
Does this clash with my ad agency? +
The opposite. Every point of conversion makes every channel look smarter. I stay out of the ad account, I make the ad account look good. Your media buyer will like me.
Who owns the work? +
You do. Every page, variant, result and piece of research, plus the full testing log. If we part ways it all stays with you, and whoever takes over inherits a map, not a blank page.
Why only three brands? +
Because this is me, not a team wearing my name. Three seats is the honest ceiling at the standard I put my name on. When they fill, this page says so.
TWENTY MINUTES

If the numbers work, let's talk.

Twenty minutes on your real funnel. I will tell you what I would test first and roughly what I think it is worth. If your numbers do not clear the bar, I will say so and we both save the time.

Book the fit call

$7,500 a month · three brands at a time