I test the buyer types your brand could own, in parallel, and hand your media buyer the winners. Budget goes vertical into proven ads. New audiences open horizontally, already proven. I do the work myself.
Three seats. When they are full, booking closes and this page says so.
Every growth story you envy is the same two moves compounding. Most accounts only ever make one of them.
Find an ad that converts and feed it budget. Every operator knows this move because it works: same creative, same audience, bigger number.
Then the ceiling. Push a winner past its audience and CPMs climb, ROAS thins, and the account that doubled last quarter stalls. Vertical alone always ends in the same place: a plateau with money parked on it.
Your product has more buyers than your account touches. A different person, a different reason to buy, a different page that convinces them.
I test those buyer types in parallel, three pages per persona, and traffic picks the winners. Each one that proves out is a new audience your account can spend into at the economics of a fresh market instead of a saturated one.
Vertical growth is a line. Horizontal growth is a line. Together they are area: every new audience gives your winners fresh room to scale up, and every budget raise pays out across more audiences.
That is Scaling+. I produce tested winners on both axes. Your media buyer scales them. The account compounds instead of plateauing.
Everything below is what running Scaling+ on your brand looks like.
A page wins when it clears the significance bar we agreed in writing and holds at full traffic. Within one business day it is flagged in our shared channel with the numbers and an angle brief: who it convinced and why, in words your ads can use. Once a week we sit for thirty minutes: what won, what died, what runs next.
Run your own ads? The brief lands the same way, ready to spend behind in minutes. Media buying at an agency? They keep the account, the log keeps us honest, and nothing waits on a monthly deck.
Not another agency to manage. A senior guy on your team who takes the entire funnel side off your desk, so your ad spend goes further.
Funnels, landing pages, offers and angles, the whole testing program, and a log that shows you what happened. You approve, I run it.
Your media buyer and creative team. Winning angles flow into their ads, their ad data flows into my pages, and every page matches the promise the ad made.
Your ad account, your email flows, your brand design. Your team keeps their lanes. My job is to make everyone's numbers look better.
Winners come to you as ready-to-spend briefs, not homework. The point is fewer late nights in the ad account, not another dashboard to check.
They keep the account and the credit. I feed it. One shared log, one weekly sync, and my winners never wait in anyone's quarterly queue.
I slot in as the funnel lane under your CMO, report in your format, and stay out of the org chart. Your team keeps their lanes and their wins.
The senior funnel hire you keep meaning to make, on your team now, without the hire. That is what fractional means.
Your buyers do not all want the same thing. The personas come from your reviews, tickets and session recordings; entering a market where you have none yet, I mine the nearest neighbours: competitor reviews and the market you already own. Each persona gets its own angle, each angle gets three real pages, not a headline swap. Then we find out.
I mine your reviews and tickets for the real reasons people buy. Each reason becomes a persona.
Every persona gets three genuinely different pages. Different promise, different proof, different structure.
They run against your control, sized so the answer is real rather than a hunch.
Sometimes one page lands. Sometimes a whole persona is a goldmine and all three beat control.
Nine real pages used to be a quarter of work and most of a budget. Building them is now the cheap part. Which means you get to find out instead of guess.
One page in your funnel. Your revenue through it, your margin, one winning test.
Whatever number lands on the right is what a single winner is worth to you, every month it keeps running. You already know whether that is interesting.
Subscription brand? We swap the metric: subscribe rate or day-90 retained revenue, agreed in writing, and no test is called a winner before a renewal cycle proves it.
Not theory. These are the reps behind every hypothesis I will put in front of your traffic.
Across twelve years, that much has run through funnels I tested and rebuilt: at cnvrt.co, at the page agency, and since. I have seen what wins across categories, price points and margins, which is why my first guess is rarely my worst one.
Every dollar clients paid me at cnvrt.co came back eighty times over across the programs I ran that year. Measured against agreed baselines, not estimated after the fact.
I ran the landing page agency. I wrote the copy, designed the structures, and charged five thousand a page because that is what it took. I know this work from the inside.
Warm traffic forgives a weak offer. Your list already trusts you, so it converts almost anything. Cold traffic does not, which makes it the only honest test of whether something can scale.
I spend my days there. At nativeadagency.co we buy native traffic for e-commerce brands and get paid on performance, which means an offer that does not work cold does not get paid.
That is the lens I bring to your funnel: not just a page that converts your existing audience better, but an offer strangers say yes to at volume.
Cold buyers have no reason to trust you. The claim has to be specific enough to be checkable and modest enough to be credible.
An offer that only works at a 2 ROAS is not an offer, it is a hobby. I build the economics backwards from what you can afford to pay for a customer.
Bundles, guarantees, and structures that answer "why now" without a countdown timer insulting anybody's intelligence.
If it wins cold, it wins warm, and it keeps winning as you pour more spend into it. That order never runs backwards.
I ran the landing page agency. I wrote the copy. I designed the structures. I know exactly what makes a page convert, because I spent years finding out the expensive way.
Now I tell AI to do precisely what I would have done by hand. Same conversion performance. Often better, because I can afford to build five and let your traffic pick.
The work that used to be $5,000 and a week is now a fraction of both. I did not get cheaper. The production got cheaper, and I passed it on.
Same rigor, same research discipline, same statistical bar. In 2023 that meant roughly a page a fortnight. The stack drafts and builds at twenty-five times that pace; I still QA every line, which is why a seat ships four-plus finished, tested pages a month instead of fifty rough ones.
Anyone can prompt a page. Knowing how to direct these tools so the result is indistinguishable from anything else on your store is the entire skill. That is the difference between me and someone who just discovered them.
I did not just learn AI. I built my own stack on top of it: the system that researches angles, writes pages, and builds funnels the way I would by hand. It is what makes four-plus real pages a month possible at all.
Every client seat includes full access for your whole team, free, while we work together. Everything the tools produce: pages, research, the full testing log, is yours forever, working together or not.
I have not released the stack publicly. A seat is currently the only way to run it.
You are reading it. This page, the diagrams, the testing pages behind nativeadagency's cold-traffic campaigns: all researched, drafted and built on the stack, then finished by hand.
I will not hand you a launch story dressed up as proof. The only demo I trust is one you can inspect, and you are in it right now.
A page was a week and five thousand dollars, so everybody built one, defended it, and called that a strategy. You could not afford to miss.
The arrows got cheap. Fire twenty and the ones that miss cost you almost nothing, while the ones that land keep paying every month they run.
That is the whole shift, and most stores have not caught up to it yet.
The tenth thousand you push into a funnel never performs like the first. The good inventory is already yours, so you start buying worse traffic at the margin and the blended number quietly sags.
Most brands accept that, because they only have one funnel worth spending on. When you have four, you never have to push any of them past the point where they stop working.
Nothing is being force-fed traffic it cannot convert, so your blended cost per acquisition comes down instead of creeping up.
Four funnels returning cleanly beats one funnel returning slowly. The money comes back faster and buys the next day of spend.
One funnel is one worn-out winner, one account issue, one seasonal dip away from a bad quarter. Four is a portfolio.
Same budget. Spread across things that are provably working instead of concentrated on the one thing you happened to build first. That option only exists once building the alternatives got cheap.
Read from your analytics, not mine. This is the format your board uses from week one.
Cold traffic did not understand the bundle. Hero rewritten around the strongest phrase from 214 reviews.
Guarantee restated beside price. Did not move the number. Killed at half traffic. Cost four days.
Shipping fields before account creation on mobile. Sized to significance before shipping.
This is the format, shown with representative entries. Your log fills with your tests from week one, read from your analytics, not mine. Client logs stay confidential, which is exactly what yours will do.
If you are reading the left column nodding, the rest of this page is arithmetic. And the closer you run to seven figures a month, the more every winner is worth.
Start with the number you took from the math above: what one winner is worth to you, every month it runs. Hold it. Now the three ways to buy the job.
$200k+ a year in salary. Loaded, your CFO's version: payroll, benefits, equity, a recruiter fee, and three months of ramp before the first test ships. Do that division honestly.
$12–20k a month buys a good retainer: typically two tests a month, a monthly deck, and an account manager between you and whoever does the work.
Judged against your number. Working day one, no ramp, no recruiter. Four-plus tested pages a month, the stack included, cancel any month. Priced to be obvious next to one winner, not next to a salary line.
Every seat starts the same way: a first ninety days with the scope, the baseline, and the benchmark agreed in writing before anything ships. You know exactly what you are judging, and when. Three seats total.
Twenty minutes on your real funnel. I will tell you what I would test first and roughly what I think it is worth. If your numbers do not clear the bar, I will say so and we both save the time.
Book the fit callBring whoever runs your ads. The call is better with them on it.